Friday, August 19, 2011

What if the Tea Party were Black? by Tim Wise

A colleague of mine reminded me of this short article by Tim Wise.  It's a really good way of demonstrating white privilege, especially in the everyday, "normal" issues on the intersections of comfort and race.  Now I'm sure there are plenty of people who will argue that the tea party, especially its more radical, gun-toting arm makes them uncomfortable, but that's not the point.  The point is, imagine if instead of being mostly white, they were mostly black? I think anyone who thinks about this seriously and honestly will come away with the same conclusion. Imagine if a number of black men showed up at a state capital or city hall, or even a bar legally carrying firearms? There's no way that would be allowed.  People would be shitting their pants, the tea party would be cast as a crazy, radical, terrorist organization, many would be thrown in jail and some might even be shot.  We'd be seeing random video clips taken completely out of context that reveal the "real danger these people pose to the safety and security of "normal" Americans.  White folks left and right would be falling in line with the political and media constructed narratives.  Here's the link to the pdf.  Or, you can read it below.

Tim Wise: Imagine If the Tea Party Was Black
By Tim Wise  Ephphata Poetry

Let’s play a game, shall we? The name of the game is called “Imagine.” The
way it’s played is simple: we’ll envision recent happenings in the news, but
then change them up a bit. Instead of envisioning white people as the main
actors in the scenes we’ll conjure - the ones who are driving the action - we’ll
envision black folks or other people of color instead. The object of the game is
to imagine the public reaction to the events or incidents, if the main actors
were of color, rather than white. Whoever gains the most insight into the
workings of race in America, at the end of the game, wins.
So let’s begin.

Imagine that hundreds of black protesters were to descend upon Washington
DC and Northern Virginia, just a few miles from the Capitol and White
House, armed with AK-47s, assorted handguns, and ammunition. And
imagine that some of these protesters —the black protesters — spoke of the
need for political revolution, and possibly even armed conflict in the event that
laws they didn’t like were enforced by the government? Would these protester
— these black protesters with guns — be seen as brave defenders of the
Second Amendment, or would they be viewed by most whites as a danger to
the republic? What if they were Arab-Americans? Because, after all, that’s
what happened recently when white gun enthusiasts descended upon the
nation’s capital, arms in hand, and verbally announced their readiness to make
war on the country’s political leaders if the need arose.

Imagine that white members of Congress, while walking to work, were
surrounded by thousands of angry black people, one of whom proceeded to
spit on one of those congressmen for not voting the way the black
demonstrators desired. Would the protesters be seen as merely patriotic
Americans voicing their opinions, or as an angry, potentially violent, and even
insurrectionary mob? After all, this is what white Tea Party protesters did
recently in Washington.

Imagine that a rap artist were to say, in reference to a white president: “He’s a
piece of shit and I told him to suck on my machine gun.” Because that’s what
rocker Ted Nugent said recently about President Obama.
Imagine that a prominent mainstream black political commentator had long
employed an overt bigot as Executive Director of his organization, and that
this bigot regularly participated in black separatist conferences, and once
assaulted a white person while calling them by a racial slur. When that
prominent black commentator and his sister — who also works for the
organization — defended the bigot as a good guy who was misunderstood and
“going through a tough time in his life” would anyone accept their excuse2
making? Would that commentator still have a place on a mainstream
network? Because that’s what happened in the real world, when Pat
Buchanan employed as Executive Director of his group, America’s Cause, a
blatant racist who did all these things, or at least their white equivalents:
attending white separatist conferences and attacking a black woman while
calling her the n-word.

Imagine that a black radio host were to suggest that the only way to get
promoted in the administration of a white president is by “hating black
people,” or that a prominent white person had only endorsed a white
presidential candidate as an act of racial bonding, or blamed a white president
for a fight on a school bus in which a black kid was jumped by two white kids,
or said that he wouldn’t want to kill all conservatives, but rather, would like to
leave just enough—“living fossils” as he called them—“so we will never forget
what these people stood for.” After all, these are things that Rush Limbaugh
has said, about Barack Obama’s administration, Colin Powell’s endorsement
of Barack Obama, a fight on a school bus in Belleville, Illinois in which two
black kids beat up a white kid, and about liberals, generally.

Imagine that a black pastor, formerly a member of the U.S. military, were to
declare, as part of his opposition to a white president’s policies, that he was
ready to “suit up, get my gun, go to Washington, and do what they trained me
to do.” This is, after all, what Pastor Stan Craig said recently at a Tea Party
rally in Greenville, South Carolina.

Imagine a black radio talk show host gleefully predicting a revolution by
people of color if the government continues to be dominated by the rich white
men who have been “destroying” the country, or if said radio personality were
to call Christians or Jews non-humans, or say that when it came to
conservatives, the best solution would be to “hang ‘em high.” And what would
happen to any congressional representative who praised that commentator for
“speaking common sense” and likened his hate talk to “American values?”
After all, those are among the things said by radio host and best-selling author
Michael Savage, predicting white revolution in the face of multiculturalism, or
said by Savage about Muslims and liberals, respectively. And it was
Congressman Culbertson, from Texas, who praised Savage in that way,
despite his hateful rhetoric.

Imagine a black political commentator suggesting that the only thing the guy
who flew his plane into the Austin, Texas IRS building did wrong was not
blowing up Fox News instead. This is, after all, what Anne Coulter said about
Tim McVeigh, when she noted that his only mistake was not blowing up the
New York Times.

Imagine that a popular black liberal website posted comments about the
daughter of a white president, calling her “typical redneck trash,” or a “whore”
whose mother entertains her by “making monkey sounds.” After all that’s
comparable to what conservatives posted about Malia Obama on last year, when they referred to her as “ghetto trash.”
Imagine that black protesters at a large political rally were walking around
with signs calling for the lynching of their congressional enemies. Because
that’s what white conservatives did last year, in reference to Democratic party
leaders in Congress.

In other words, imagine that even one-third of the anger and vitriol currently
being hurled at President Obama, by folks who are almost exclusively white,
were being aimed, instead, at a white president, by people of color. How many
whites viewing the anger, the hatred, the contempt for that white president
would then wax eloquent about free speech, and the glories of democracy?
And how many would be calling for further crackdowns on thuggish behavior,
and investigations into the radical agendas of those same people of color?

To ask any of these questions is to answer them. Protest is only seen as
fundamentally American when those who have long had the luxury of seeing
themselves as prototypically American engage in it. When the dangerous and
dark “other” does so, however, it isn’t viewed as normal or natural, let alone
patriotic. Which is why Rush Limbaugh could say, this past week, that the
Tea Parties are the first time since the Civil War that ordinary, common
Americans stood up for their rights: a statement that erases the normalcy and
“American-ness” of blacks in the civil rights struggle, not to mention women in
the fight for suffrage and equality, working people in the fight for better
working conditions, and LGBT folks as they struggle to be treated as full and
equal human beings.

And this, my friends, is what white privilege is all about. The ability to
threaten others, to engage in violent and incendiary rhetoric without
consequence, to be viewed as patriotic and normal no matter what you do, and
never to be feared and despised as people of color would be, if they tried to get
away with half the shit we do, on a daily basis.

No comments:

Post a Comment